Live dashboards
Current case load, triage latency distribution, escalations open and closed, source health by connector, and the full verdict history on any alert you want to inspect.
One pipeline, three disciplines.
Venaera runs a single continuous workflow over your environment: detecting at machine speed, prioritizing with cybersecurity-trained reasoning, and containing with human-approved action. Signal enters once and leaves as either a closed finding or a handled incident.
- Triage target
- Under 60 seconds, every alert
- Alert scope
- Complete, with noise suppressed
- Response
- Automated execution, analyst approval
- Feedback
- Every verdict trains the next read
Stage 01
Detect
Ingest, normalize, enrich, and issue a first verdict on everything that arrives.
Stage 02
Prioritize
Score behaviour, collapse correlated noise, and rank what a human should see.
Stage 03
Contain
Confirm, approve, execute, and close with the evidence written down.
Loop
Learn
Return every verdict to the models so the pipeline sharpens on your estate.
Detect
Triage every alert, in under a minute.
Domain-specific models ingest and triage every incoming alert from every connected source. Nothing is sampled, nothing is queued for business hours, and nothing is dropped because a rule was too noisy to keep enabled. Coverage is a property of the design rather than a configuration choice you have to defend in a budget meeting.
- Sub minute triage on every alert, continuously, across the entire environment.
- Complete ingestion from cloud, endpoint, identity, email, network, and SaaS telemetry.
- Normalization and enrichment so signal from hundreds of tools speaks one language.
- Source health auditing so a pipeline that silently stops is caught in hours, not at the next audit.
Ingested 24h
12,847
Mean triage
00:41
p95 triage
00:57
Source health
100%
Live triage stream
Verdict and elapsed
- triaged 00:38
- triaged 00:29
- triaged 00:11
- triaged 00:44
- triaged 00:52
- triaged 00:33
- triaged 00:19
Window 00:00 to 24:00
Sampling none
Queued for business hours 0
In window
12,847
Suppressed
12,793
Escalated
1
Score
91
Case 4471 · critical
edr-core · hands on keyboard
Model read: credential access against LSASS followed by lateral SMB to a domain controller inside 90 seconds, from a workstation with no administrative history. Consistent with active intrusion rather than a scheduled administrative task. Four correlated low signal alerts folded into this case.
TA0006 credential access
T1003 LSASS
TA0008 lateral movement
T1021 SMB
Evidence items 17
Correlated alerts 4
Handed to analyst 00:11
Prioritize
Surface what matters. Silence what does not.
Models score, rank, and surface only the alerts that need attention, removing the large majority of false positives while keeping every alert inside coverage. Because the models read attacker behaviour rather than matching signatures, what escalates arrives with the reasoning, the evidence, and the technique mapping already attached.
- Behavioural understanding trained on attacker tradecraft, not pattern matching alone.
- Scored and ranked so the analyst opens the one case that matters first.
- Correlation across tools so one intrusion becomes one case instead of forty alerts.
- Reasoned escalation that a human can audit, challenge, and overturn.
Suppression is a verdict, not a filter
Nothing is silently discarded
Every suppressed alert keeps its verdict, its reasoning, and its evidence, and stays queryable for the life of the engagement. Analysts audit suppression classes weekly, and you can inspect any decision the platform made on your data at any time.
Contain
Real-time guidance, decisive containment.
When a threat is confirmed, Venaera delivers an ordered containment sequence, automated execution where it is safe, and clear response steps for the work that belongs to your team. A human analyst approves every move with operational consequence, and nothing irreversible happens on a model verdict.
- Automated remediation for pre-authorized actions such as isolation and session revocation.
- Analyst approval on anything that can take a system or business process offline.
- Guided response written for the person doing the work, not a generic checklist.
- Continuous learning so each investigation improves the detections behind it.
Incident
4471
Analyst
On shift
Approval
Granted
Contained
00:26
Containment sequence
Human approved
- 01Isolate host WS-4412 from the networkdone
- 02Revoke sessions, force credential resetdone
- 03Block C2 indicators at edge and endpointrunning
- 04Sweep domain for additional footholdsqueued
- 05Hand remediation plan to client engineeringqueued
Detection reinforced +1 true positive
Indicators pushed fleet wide
Telemetry coverage
What we read, and what it tells us.
Coverage is only meaningful if you know what is inside it. This is the signal we expect from a mature estate, the behaviour each source exposes, and the response actions it makes available to us.
| Domain | Signal ingested | Detection focus | Response actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud platform | Native security findings, control plane audit logs, workload and container runtime events. | Privilege escalation, exposed storage and secrets, anomalous API use, crypto mining. | Policy correction, key revocation, resource quarantine. |
| Endpoint and EDR | Process trees, memory access, script execution, driver loads, persistence changes. | Credential theft, living off the land tooling, ransomware staging, hands on keyboard activity. | Host isolation, process termination, artefact collection. |
| Identity and access | Authentication events, session metadata, role and group changes, conditional access decisions. | Impossible travel, push fatigue, token theft, privilege creep, dormant account revival. | Session revocation, forced reset, access removal. |
| Email and collaboration | Message metadata, detonation verdicts, mailbox rule changes, sharing and permission events. | Business email compromise, payload delivery, mailbox exfiltration, consent phishing. | Message purge, rule removal, consent revocation. |
| Network and edge | Flow records, DNS resolution, proxy and firewall decisions, VPN session data. | Command and control, data staging and egress, lateral movement, tunnelling. | Perimeter blocking, DNS sinkhole, segment enforcement. |
| SaaS and business apps | Administrative actions, API and integration activity, data access and export events. | Integration abuse, mass download, privilege misuse, insider data movement. | Token revocation, integration disable, session termination. |
| Logging and SIEM | Existing normalized pipelines, retained historical telemetry, detection rule inventory. | Coverage gaps, rule decay, ingestion failure, historical scope during investigation. | Detection content updates, pipeline repair requests. |
Behind the pipeline
The parts of the platform you will never see on a dashboard.
Triage speed is the visible number. These are the practices that make the number worth trusting, and they are where most of the engineering effort actually goes.
-
01
Detection engineering as a running practice
Detection content is written, tested against your historical telemetry, and shipped in a reviewed change process. Rules that fire constantly without producing a true positive are not muted and forgotten, they are rewritten or retired with the reasoning recorded.
We also track rule decay. A detection that was precise in January degrades as your infrastructure changes around it, and we treat that drift as a defect rather than a fact of life.
-
02
What the models are trained on
Attacker tradecraft and technique taxonomies, real detection logic across major tooling, raw log and telemetry structure from the sources we support, and the accumulated verdict history of investigations across the service. The models learn the shape of your estate during onboarding and keep learning for as long as the engagement runs.
Your data is used to serve and improve your coverage. It is not pooled with other clients for model training without a separate written agreement, and sector-specific controls are honoured where they apply.
-
03
Guardrails around model autonomy
Models are permitted to read everything, score everything, suppress with reasoning, and execute only pre-authorized low consequence actions. They are not permitted to declare an incident, approve containment that interrupts a business process, or communicate to your team unreviewed. Those boundaries are enforced in the platform, not in a policy document.
-
04
Evidence retention and investigation depth
Every verdict keeps the evidence that produced it. When an intrusion turns out to have started weeks earlier, the investigation does not stop at the edge of a dashboard window, and the timeline you receive is reconstructed from retained telemetry rather than from memory.
Severity and escalation
What happens, by severity.
Severity is assigned against your environment rather than a vendor default, because a public bucket holding marketing assets and one holding claims data are not the same finding. These are the standing behaviours. Exact targets are set in your engagement.
| Severity | Analyst action | Client contact |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Immediate human review, containment prepared before contact. | Direct call to your escalation contact, any hour. |
| High | Human review on shift, containment proposed with evidence. | Notification by agreed channel with a written summary. |
| Medium | Investigated and resolved by the analyst team. | Reported in the daily digest unless it escalates. |
| Low | Verdict recorded, correlated into standing cases. | Visible on the dashboard and in weekly reporting. |
| Suppressed | Reasoning recorded, class audited weekly. | Queryable at any time, summarized monthly. |
Reporting and visibility
You should never have to ask what we did last month.
Reporting is built for three different readers: the engineer who needs detail, the security lead who needs trend, and the executive or auditor who needs evidence that the control exists and works.
Weekly operations review
What was escalated and why, what was contained, tuning changes shipped, detection coverage added, and the specific items waiting on your team with named owners.
Monthly and quarterly reporting
Trend against prior periods, posture movement, recurring root causes, threat activity relevant to your sector, and audit ready evidence of monitoring and response.
Incident record
Every incident closes with a written record: timeline, scope, actions taken with timestamps and the analyst who approved them, root cause where determinable, and remediation owned by name.
Audit export
Monitoring coverage, alert disposition, and response evidence export in formats your auditors and examiners actually accept, without a special request each cycle.
Post incident review
Material incidents get a review with your engineers: what worked, what did not, what detection or control change prevents a repeat, and what we got wrong.
Request a briefing
See the pipeline against your own telemetry.
Bring us your source inventory and your current alert volume. We will walk the pipeline stage by stage against what you actually run and show you where coverage changes.
Request a briefing
Response within one business day